Changes

[[File:Pedio.jpg|thumb|200px|right|[https://www.instagram.com/wildandsour/ Pediococcus - picture taken by Per Karlsson]]]

'''''Pediococcus''''' (often referred to by brewers as ''"Pedio''") are Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in the production of Belgian style beers where additional acidity is desirable. They are native to plant material and fruits <ref name="ucdavis">[http://wineserver.ucdavis.edu/industry/enology/winemicro/winebacteria/pediococcus_damnosus.html Viticulture & Enology. UC Davis website. Pedioccous damnosus. Retreived Retrieved 07/28/2015.]</ref>, and often found in [[Spontaneous_Fermentation|spontaneously fermented ]] beer as the primary source of lactic acid production (with ''P. damnosus'' being the only species identified in such beers[[Lambic]]) <ref>[http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095384 The Microbial Diversity of Traditional Spontaneously Fermented Lambic Beer. Freek Spitaels, Anneleen D. Wieme, Maarten Janssens, Maarten Aerts, Heide-Marie Daniel, Anita Van Landschoot, Luc De Vuyst, Peter Vandamme. April 18, 2014.]</ref><ref>[[Scientific_Publications#Lambic_and_Spontaneous_Fermentation |Multiple Scientific publications linked on MTF.]]</ref>. It is also seen as a major source of beer contamination in commercial breweries due to its ability to adapt to and survive in beer. The ability to grow in beer is strain dependent rather than species dependent, however, genetic differences indicate that ''P. damnosus'' and ''P. claussenii'' are better adapted to surviving in beer than ''P. pentosaceus'' <ref name="Snauwaert">[http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12864-015-1438-z.pdf Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer environment. Isabel Snauwaert, Pieter Stragier, Luc De Vuyst and Peter Vandamme. 2015.]</ref>. Like many bacteria, pediococci have the ability to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_gene_transfer transfer genes horizontally] without reproduction <ref name="Snauwaert"></ref>. They are generally considered to be facultative anaerobes, meaning that which means they are capable grow anaerobically but can also grow in the presence of oxygen <ref>[http://textbookofbacteriology.net/lactics.html Lactic Acid Bacteria. Todar's Online Texbook of Bacteriology. Kenneth Todar, PhD. Pg 1. Retrieved 08/09/2015.]</ref>. Some species/strains (including individual strains of metabolism ''P. damnosus'') can have their growth and acid production inhibited by oxygen <ref name="NAKAGAWA">[https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jgam1955/5/3/5_3_95/_article TAXONOMIC STUDIES ON THE GENUS PEDIOCOCCUS. ATSUSHI NAKAGAWA, KAKUO KITAHARA. 1959.]</ref>, while some will have better growth and produce more acid in both aerobic the presence of oxygen (microaerophilic) <ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC357257/ THE NUTRITION AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE GENUS PEDIOCOCCUS. Erling M. Jensen and anaerobic environmentsHarry W. Seeley. 1954.]</ref><ref>[http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/8/1/3#B5 Pediocins: The bacteriocins of pediococci. Sources, production, properties and applications. Maria Papagianni and Sofia Anastasiadou. 2009.]</ref>. Strains found in beer are hop tolerant <ref>[http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/16/267 Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer environment. Isabel Snauwaert, Pieter Stragier, Luc De Vuyst and Peter Vandamme. April 2015.]</ref>. Due to their continued metabolism of longer chain polysaccharides, acid production will increase with storage time. ''PedioPediococcus'' can form a [[pellicle]].

''Pediococcus'' may also cause “ropiness” (also called a "sick beer") due to the production of exopolysaccharideswhen exposed to a fresh sugar source. "Ropy" or "sick" beer is more viscous and, in extreme circumstances, can form strands. Sickness effects mostly the mouthfeel and appearance of the beer, and may have no influence on the flavor. It is considered a temporary flaw in sour beer. Some brewers, including Vinnie Cilurzo from Russian River Brewing and some Belgian lambic producers, claim that after the ropiness goes away (generally in 3-6 months <ref name="ropy_time"></ref>) it produces a deeper acidity and mouthfeel, and is viewed as a positive process in the production of sour beer <ref>[http://www.xxlbrewing.com/hb/sour_beer/img_09.html Cilurzo, Vinnie. AHA Sour Beer presentation. 2007.]</ref>. For other brewers, ropy beer is seen as a nuisance due to the beer needing to be aged for a longer period of time, especially when it occurs shortly after bottling. ''Pediococcus'' species can also produce diacetyl with extended storage time<ref name="Garcia-Garcia" />. ''[[Brettanomyces]] '' can break down exopolysaccharides and diacetyl produced by ''Pediococcus'' and the two are often used together.

See ''[[Lactobacillus]]'', ''[[Brettanomyces]]'', ''[[Saccharomyces]]'', and [[Mixed Cultures]], [[Kveik#Commercial_Availability|Kveik]], and [[Nonconventional Yeasts and Bacteria]] charts for other commercially available cultures.  ==Introduction of Characteristics and Taxonomy==''Pediococcus'' can either improve or detract from fermented food products, including beer, wine, and cider. They play an important role in the fermentation of some meats and cheeses. They tend to be the primary souring microorganism in the production of [[Lambic|Belgian lambic]]. Some species have also been isolated from plants, fruit, and fermenting plant material. In wine, ''P. parvulus'' is the most common species found, and in beer ''P. damnosus'' is the most common. ''P. pentosaceus'' tends to be more hop sensitive than ''P. damnosus'' <ref name="Wade_2018">[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366 Role of Pediococcus in winemaking. M.E. Wade, M.T. Strickland, J.P. Osborn, C.G. Edwards. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12366.]</ref>.  Currently, there are 11 recognized species of ''Pediococcus''. They are ''P. acidilactici'', ''P. argentinicus'', ''P. cellicola'', ''P. claussenii'', ''P. damnosus'', ''P. ethanolidurans'', ''P. inopinatus'', ''P. parvulus'', ''P. pentosaceus'' (subspecies ''pentosaceus'' and ''intermedius''), ''P. siamensis'', and ''P. stilesii''. ''P. cerevisiae'' was reclassified into either ''P. damnosus'' or ''P. pentosaceus''. Other species of ''Pediococcus'' have also been reclassified to other genera in the last couple of decades. ''P. dextrinicus'' is now classified as ''Lactobacillus dextrinicus'', ''P. urinae-equi'' is now classified as ''Aerococcus urinae‐equi'', and ''P. halophilis'' is now classified as ''Tetragenococcus halophilis'' <ref name="Wade_2018" />. Pediococci are described as coccoidal (spherical) or ovoid (egg-shaped) in shape. They are Gram-positive, non-motile (not capable of moving on their own), and non-spore forming. They are obligate homofermentive and typically do not produce CO₂, ethanol, or acetic acid, although there are a few exceptions to this in the literature. They do not produce [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalase catalase] (except for some ''P. pentocaseus'' strains which were reported to have pseudo-catalase activity by Simpson and Taguchi 1995) or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidase oxidase] enzymes. Because of the way that ''Pedioccous'' cells divide, they often appear stuck together in pairs or clumps. They are the only lactic acid bacteria found in wine and beer to do this, so they are easily identifiable at the genus level under a microscope based on their tendency to clump together. When grown on agar that is supplemented with 100 mg/L of pimaricin, the colonies are white-grey with a diameter of about 1 mm. Ropy strains have a high elasticity, and when touched with a needle, long threads can be drawn and sometimes the colonies completely stick to the needle. See [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366 table 2 from Wade et al. (2018)] for more species identification indicators and what carbohydrates different species can ferment <ref name="Wade_2018" /><ref name="Oevelen_1979">[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-37-0034 D. Van Oevelen & H. Verachtert (1979) Slime Production by Brewery Strains of Pediococcus Cerevisiae, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 37:1, 34-37, DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-37-0034.]</ref>. See also:* [https://wol-prod-cdn.literatumonline.com/cms/attachment/fcb6edb6-00be-4757-822c-be0a341a4191/ajgw12366-fig-0001-m.jpg Microscopy image of ''Pediococcus''.]

| [[White LabsBootleg Biology]]/[[Spot Yeast]] || Sour Weapon P (''Pediococcus pentosaceus'' Blend) || ''P. pentosaceus'' blend || Perfect for acidifying unhopped wort quickly for kettle or “quick” sours. At 98F, it’s capable of achieving a pH of 3.3 within 18 hours. At 84F, it can reach a pH of 3.5 within 24 hours. With more time, a terminal pH of 3.1 may be reached. ''P. pentosaceus'' can also be used for long-term sours. It is capable of growing and producing lactic acid in worts with IBUs as high as 30, though it is recommended for unhopped worts as IBUs over 10 may prevent significant quick souring. At ~30 IBU, souring occurs in 2-3 months <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1302981419730069/?comment_id=1870460696315469&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D Justin Amaral and Per Karlsson on Bootleg biology Sour Weapon hop tolerance. milk The Funk Facebook group. 11/2/2017.]</ref>. This culture may produce antimicrobials called bacteriocins or pediocins. These can inhibit and kill similar species of bacteria like Lactobacillus and other Pediococcus species in mixed-culture fermentations. Read Bootleg Biology's [https://www.facebook.com/BootlegBiology/photos/a.148869931970401.1073741829.124634287727299/465185997005458/?type=1&theater Facebook post] regarding bacteriocins for more info. No signs of ropiness (exopolysaccharides) have occurred in testing <ref>[http://bootlegbiology.com/product/sour-weapon-pediococcus-pentosaceus-blend/ Bootleg Biology website. Retrieved 05/06/2016.]</ref>. It is still unknown how hops will affect souring in a long term scenario. Bootleg Biology is still researching long term effects and awaiting peoples feedback as of 5/23/2016.|- | [[East Coast Yeast]] || ECY33 || ''P. parvulus'' || Isolated from lambic which was refermented with grapes, this strain of ''Pediococcus'' produces lactic acid, diacetyl, and may cause ropiness in beer. Always add ''Brettanomyces'' where ''Pediococcus'' is used <ref name="ecy_website">[http://www.eastcoastyeast.com/wild-stuff.html "Wild Yeast / Brettanomyces / Lactic Bacteria". East Coast Yeast website. Retrieved 04/27/2018.]</ref>. |-| [[Escarpment Laboratories]] || Pediococcus Blend || Two ''Pediococcus'' strains (''P. damnosus'' and ''P. pentosaceus'') || This blend of 2 hop-resistant Pediococcus strains (P. damnosus and P. pentosaceus) is intended for use in long-term souring. Neither strain has been observed to produce exopolysaccharides (EPS). We recommend 15 IBU or less in the first generation.|-| [[Inland Island Brewing & Consulting|Inland Island Yeast Laboratories]] || WLP661 INISBC-998 || ''P. damnosus '' || High Gram positive cocci that produces lactic acid. Also produces diacetyl producer and slow several proteins that may cause a "rope" to form in the beer. Rope will disappear with time. Oxygen and hop sensitive. 75-90°F Temperature Range. '''No longer available.'''|-| [[Mainiacal Yeast]] (CLOSED) || MYPP1 || ''P. pentocaceus'' || Isolated from a growingmarijuana plant. Fermentation temp: No production of diacetyl or EPS, with a clean acidity. Ferment at 70-85°F 100°F <ref name="Amaral_Mainiacal">Private correspondence with Justin Amaral by Dan Pixley. 01/24/2018.</ref>. Commercial pitches only.|-| [[Mainiacal Yeast]] (21CLOSED) || MYPD1 || ''P. damnosus'' || Isolated from a bottle of belgian lambic. Produces diacetyl and EPS, so use in conjunction with ''Brettanomyces''. Ferment at 70-90°F <ref name="Amaral_Mainiacal" />. Commercial pitches only.|-| [[Omega Yeast Labs]] || OYL-29606 || ''P.4° Cdamnosus'' || This modestly hop tolerant Pedio strain produces a clean lactic tang over time. The strain can produce diacetyl so it is often paired with one or more Brett strains (to consume the diacetyl). AttenuationWhile more hop tolerant than the Lacto Blend (OYL-605), IBUs over 5-10 IBU may inhibit souring. Souring time can vary depending on IBU level <ref>[https://omegayeast.com/yeast/bacterial-cultures/pediococcus Pediococcus OYL-606. Omega Yeast Labs website. Retrieved 06/11/2019.]</ref>. EPS production is unknown and has not been observed or reported <ref>[https: 65//www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2719576444737219/?comment_id=2719963548031842&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D Adi Hastings. Milk The Funk Facebook group on OYL Pediococcus EPS production. 06/11/2019.]</ref>. Commercial pitches only.|-| [[Propagate Lab]] || MIP-920 || ''P. damnosus'' || Will sour a finished beer over time to a pH of 3.5 - 3.1. It works well at room temperature and is hop tolerant. It may produce ropiness <ref>[http://www.propagatelab.com/mip-920pediodamn Propagate Labs website. MIP-920. Retrieved 06/20/2020.]</ref>.

| [[RVA Yeast Labs]] || RVA 601 || ''P. damnosus'' || Lactic acid bacteria used in souring Belgian-style beers such as gueze and Lambic. Acid production increases with storage. Temperature range is 60-95°F. |-| [[White Labs]] || WLP661 || ''P. damnosus'' || High diacetyl (a.k.a. butter) producer and slow growing. Fermentation temp: 70-85°F (21-29.4° C). Attenuation: 65%. Cell count: 50-80 million cells/mL <ref name="WL_cellcounts">Private correspondence with White Labs Customer Service and Dan Pixley. 10/29/2015.</ref>. Homebrew vials contain 35 mL of slurry, and ~1.75-2.8 billion cells per vial <ref name="priess_pitches">[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1170980479596831/?comment_id=1171066879588191&reply_comment_id=1171595552868657&total_comments=6&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R9%22%7D Conversation with Richard Priess regarding WL and Wyeast homebrew pitches. 10/30/2015.]</ref>.|-| [[Wyeast]] || 5733 || ''P. damnosus '' (previously listed as ''P. cerevisiae'') || May cause “ropiness” and produce low levels of diacetyl with extended storage time. Temp range: 60-95° F (15-35° C). Cell count: 1.0 x 10⁸ (100 million) cells/mL <ref>[https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8CshC9nxYHdZmE4MmoyLXA2WVk&usp=sharing Wyeast Specifications 2015 Retail Products. 2015.]</ref>. Homebrew packs contain 100-125 mL of slurry, and ~10-12.5 billion cells <ref name="priess_pitches"></ref>.

<blockquote>"If using 1 pack of 5733 per 5 gallon batch; and either adding to secondary after alcoholic fermentation is complete, or co-inoculating with a SacchSaccharomyces' strain, then a starter would not be necessary. If you did want or need to propagate, I'd recommend 2 liters of 1.030-1.040 wort per pack, incubated at 80-90*F, without agitation." - Michael Dawson, Wyeast.

<blockquote>"We just performed an interesting experiment at The Rare Barrel with pedio. Jay, our head brewer and blender, wanted a more acidic beer that we could use as a blending component while also growing up our diminishing pedio culture. So we racked 2 oak barrels of gold fermented with [[Brettanomyces|Brettanomyces claussenii]] and White Labs ''Pediococcus damnosus '' (WLP661) into one of our 30 bbl batches of 12*p gold wort that had been acidified to about 4.5 pH in the kettle using lactic acid (our first hot side experiment!). No oxygen, really wanted to encourage the bacteria. Within 10 days the pH was 3.6 and the gravity 10.7. We were all surprised how quickly the pedio was working. We eventually racked a "splash" of fermenting gold with BSI Brett D and BSI Lacto D to drop the gravity. The beer had a bright acidity quickly and I was surprised at how well rounded the flavors were when we racked into barrels after a month in the fermenting vessel.

This might be a little harder to do at home, but I think there's potential for interesting results. ''Pediococcus '' shines long term traditionally so I agree with the posts above, if you're going for quick acidity I'd go lacto, but I plan on playing around with early ''Pediococcus '' fermentations at home." - Mike Makris from The Rare Barrel <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1041019779259569/?comment_id=1041073789254168&offset=0&total_comments=8 Conversation with Mike Makris on Milk The Funk.]</ref>.</blockquote> ''Pediococcus'' has a reputation for being a "slow worker", meaning that it produces acidity overtime. Staff at The Rare Barrel noticed that pitching on second generations of White Labs WLP661 ''Pediococcus'' might help the ''Pediococcus'' produce acidity very quickly <ref name="SourHour29">[http://www.thebrewingnetwork.com/the-sour-hour-episode-29/ The Sour Hour Episode 29 on The Brewing Network, interview with The Rare Barrel staff. 02/19/2016.]</ref> (~19 minutes in). They speculate that oxygen exposure might inhibit acid production with the White Labs WLP661 ''P. damnosus'' strain, however this is purely speculative and anecdotal <ref name="SourHour29"></ref> (~32 minutes in).

[[File:Pedio sugarsEMP Pathway.JPGjpg|thumb|300200px|right|Pedio fermentables [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366 Homofermentative Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) pathway for the production of lactic acid, acetoin, diacetyl and 2,3‐butanediol and acetic acid production from citrate metabolism. Image by Wade et al (2018).]]] About 90% of sugar metabolized by ''Pediococcus'' produces both L- and D-lactic acid <ref name="Wade_2018" />. It does so by homolactic fermentation producing primarily lactic acid (same EMP pathway as [[Lactobacillus#Types_of_Metabolism|''Lactobacillus'' homolactic fermentation]]), although some species/strains can convert glycerol to lactic acid, acetic acid, acetoin, and CO2 under aerobic conditions (''P. damnosus'' is not in this category) <ref>Wine [https://books.google.com/books?id=1b1CAgAAQBAJ&pg=RA2-PA1&lpg=RA2-PA1&dq=pediococcus+damnosus+homolactic&source=bl&ots=myI2alVB78&sig=cG-yWB4GuABQFEtqD2CAyKmU0TE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBGoVChMI66C5593-xgIVCVKICh3Pcg7c#v=onepage&q=pediococcus%20damnosus%20homolactic&f=false Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. Practical Applications Pediococcus. Carl A. Batt. Academic Press, Sep 28, 1999 .]</ref>. Some strains of ''P. pentosaceus'' can ferment five-chain sugars such as xylose to produce acetic acid and lactic acid. Some strains of ''P. halophilus'' (now reclassified as ''Tetragenococcus halophilis'') can convert citric acid into acetic acid and oxaloacetate (oxaloacetate is then further reduced to acetic acid and diacetyl, and the diacetyl is further reduced to acetoin, and Procedures2,3-butanediol) by producing citrate lyase enzyme. Kenneth CThis generally occurs at a slower rate than malolactic fermentation and depends on pH and temperature. Fugelsang However, all species in the ''Pediococcus'' genus are considered obligatory homofermentative because of the pathways that they use <ref>[http://aem.asm.org/content/81/20/7233.full A Genomic View of Lactobacilli and pediococci Demonstrates that Phylogeny Matches Ecology and Physiology. Jinshui Zheng, Lifang Ruan, Charles GMing Sun and Michael Gänzle. Edwards 2015.]</ref><ref name="Wade_2018" /><ref>[https://aem.asm.org/content/53/6/1257.short Citrate Metabolism by Pediococcus halophilus. Chiyuki Kanbe, Kinji Uchida. 1987.]]</ref>.

About 90% of sugar metabolized by ===Diacetyl and Acetoin===''Pediococcus'' produces lactic acidP. It does so by homolactic fermentation (same EMP pathway as [[Lactobacillus#Types_of_Metabolism|damnosus''Lactobacillus'' homolactic fermentation]]), although some species/strains can convert glycerol to produce high amounts of diacetyl and acetoin during lactic acid, acetic acid, acetoin, and CO2 under aerobic conditions (''P. damnosus'' is not in this category) production <ref>[httpshttp://booksonlinelibrary.googlewiley.com/books?id=1b1CAgAAQBAJ&pg=RA2doi/10.1046/j.1365-PA1&lpg=RA22672.2000.00956.x/pdf Identification of pediococci by ribotyping. R. Satokari, T. Mattila-PA1&dq=pediococcus+damnosus+homolactic&source=bl&ots=myI2alVB78&sig=cG-yWB4GuABQFEtqD2CAyKmU0TE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBGoVChMI66C5593-xgIVCVKICh3Pcg7c#v=onepage&q=pediococcus%20damnosus%20homolactic&f=false Encyclopedia Sandholm and M.L. Suihko. Journal of Food Applied Microbiology2000, 88, 260–265. Pediococcus]</ref><ref>[http://mmbr.asm.org/content/77/2/157.full The Microbiology of Malting and Brewing. Carl Nicholas A. BattBokulicha, and Charles W. Bamforth. Academic Press, Sep 28, 1999 June 2013.]</ref>. Diacetyl is the 'buttery'Paroma and flavor found in beer (generally not favorable) and in wine (favorable in amounts between 1-4 mg/L). damnosus While other microbes found in beer and wine fermentation (namely ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' ) can ferment glucose, sucrosealso produce diacetyl, ''Pediococcus'' and galactose. Some strains of P. damnosus can ferment maltose and sucrose other lactic acid bacteria are known to be able to produce much higher amounts <ref name="ucdavisWade_2018"></ref>.

In lactic acid bacteria, diacetyl can be the byproduct of both homofermentative metabolism of sugars as well as the metabolism of citric acid, and it is a way for the cells to regenerate NADP⁺. In either of these two pathways, extra pyruvate is turned into alpha-acetolactate which then undergoes an oxidative decarboxylation reaction to produce diacetyl. Diacetyl is often reduced by yeast to acetoin and/or 2,3-butanediol, which have a higher threshold and less of an impact on the finished beer/wine <ref name===Growth "Wade_2018" />. In mixed fermentation sour beer, the breakdown of diacetyl into acetoin and Environment===2,3-butanediol is often thought to be carried out by ''P. damnosusBrettanomyces'' is sensitive in a similar way to temperature and pH''Saccharomyces'' species, but this has not been investigated that we are aware of. It has been reported that diacetyl reduction is unable to grow faster at a lower pH of 8 or higher or at 35°Caround 3. The optimal growth occurs at 22°C 5, which is a typical pH range for sour beer and 5might be one of the contributing factors to a lack of anecdotal reports of diacetyl in sour beer <ref>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jib.381 Michel, M., Meier‐Dörnberg, T., Jacob, F., Methner, F. ‐J.5 pH, Wagner, R. ''PS. damnosus'' is sensitive to environments that contain NaCl, and will not grow Hutzler, M. (2016) Review: Pure non‐Saccharomyces starter cultures for beer fermentation with concentrations of 4% NaCl a focus on secondary metabolites and practical applications. J. Inst. Brew., 122: 569– 587. doi: 10.1002/jib.381.]</ref><ref name="ucdaviskrogerus_2013">[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259331290_125th_Anniversary_Review_Diacetyl_and_its_control_during_brewery_fermentation Krogerus, K. and Gibson, B.R. (2013), 125th Anniversary Review: Diacetyl and its control during brewery fermentation. J. Inst. Brew., 119: 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.84.]</ref>.

One study showed that by starting growth in a medium ([http://wwwSeveral variables the affect diacetyl and acetoin production have been identified.neogen First of all, some strains of ''Pediococcus'' species produce diacetyl, and others do not.com/Acumedia/pdf/ProdInfo/7406_PI.pdf MRS media] that began with a pH During malolactic fermentation (conversion of 6.7citric acid to lactic acid), and allowing the pH to drop to 4temperature at which MLF is conducted can influence whether or not diacetyl is produced.14 naturally from fermentation For example, two studies reported that better growth was observedmore diacetyl and acetoin were produced during the MLF in wine at 18°C compared at 25°C. The addition effect of bacteriological peptonetemperature is not well understood, MnSO4but it has been hypothesized that it could be that at lower temperature yeast is less active and thus cannot break the diacetyl down to acetoin and 2, 3-butanediol (extended time exposed to active yeast or on lees can reduce diacetyl in wine and Tween 80 probably also increased activity beer). If SO<refsub>[http:2<//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11851822 Nel HAsub> is used, Bauer R, Vandamme EJit can bind to diacetyl in a form that cannot be tasted, Dicks LM. Growth optimization of Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832 and although the influence of pH SO₂ can become unbound and nutrients on release the production of pediocin PDdiacetyl again. An increase in citric acid can also lead to more diacetyl under semi-1aerobic conditions but not anaerobic conditions. Department The presence of Microbiology, University glucose has also been associated with higher levels of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Dec 2001.]diacetyl production in wine <ref name="Wade_2018" /ref>.

 Some strains of ''P. damnosus'' (and other bacteria) can cause a beer (or wine) to go "ropy", also known as "sick" by [[lambic]] brewers (or more specifically as "the fat sickness"; “la maladie de la graisse” in French <ref>[https://beerbybart.com/2011/04/03/true-lambic-jean-van-roy-cantillon-sick-beer/ True Lambic: Sick beers and the magic of Cantillon. Beer By Bart blog. Gail Ann Williams. 04/03/2011. Retrieved 04/23/2016.]</ref>). Reportedly, ropiness in beer that also has ''Brettanomyces'' (which is traditionally credited with breaking down the ropiness after a period of rest) usually lasts anywhere from 1 week to 3 months, although fewer reports claim that it has lasted as long as 7 months (see reference for different experiences of brewers) <ref name="ropy_time">[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1132030550158491/ Poll on Milk The Funk regarding how long ropy beer has been observed. 08/20/2015.]</ref>. Some species of ''Pediococcus'' and other lactic acid bacteria have been reported to also be able to break down ropiness <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1670311836330357/?comment_id=1670331339661740&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D Matt Humbard and Joe Idoni. Milk The Funk Facebook group. 04/29/2017.]</ref>. The viscosity of ropy beer has been reported to be higher at the bottom of wooden barrels than near the top, either due to sedimentation or perhaps more growth of ''Pediococcus'' near the bottom of wooden barrels due to yeast autolysis and/or less exposure to oxygen <ref name="Oevelen_1979" />. Despite the popularity of this talking point about ''Pediococcus'' in brewing, a lot of strains of ''Pediococcus'' used in brewing don't seem to produce ropiness, especially strains sourced from beer yeast labs. For example, Richard Preiss of [[Escarpment Laboratories]] reported only seeing ropiness from ''Pediococcus'' sourced from [[lambic]] <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2859721020722760/?comment_id=2859868767374652&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D Richard Preiss. Milk The Funk Facebook group thread on the frequency of ''Pediococcus'' caused ropiness. 08/20/2019.]</ref>.  [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-37-0034 Oevelen and Verachtert (1979)] demonstrated that ''Brettanommyces bruxllensis'' reduces the viscosity of ropiness produced by ''Pediococcus'', but that at least one strain of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' does not <ref name="Oevelen_1979" />. The scientists tested two strains of ''B. bruxellensis'', and when either one of these strains were co-pitched with a strain of ''P. damnosus'' (formerly called ''P. cerevisiae''), at two weeks there was the same level of viscosity as when the ''P. damnosus'' strain was pitched by itself, but at 4 weeks the viscosity was greatly reduced (although the viscosity was still higher than when there was no ''Pediococcus'' present). When they co-pitched a strain of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' with the ''Pediococcus'', the viscosity remained high at 4 weeks, demonstrating that this strain of ''S. cerervisiae'' was not able to reduce the viscosity of the ropiness (it is not known if this strain of ''S. cerevisiae'' was diastatic or not). The scientists also attempted to stagger the pitch of ''Brettanomyces'', pitching it two weeks after the ''Pediococcus''. This resulted in very low growth of the ''Brettanomyces'' and no reduction in viscosity due to that limited growth. The limited growth was attributed to the low pH that the ''Brettanomyces'' yeast was exposed to at inoculation time. The ''Brettanomyces'' was able to reduce the viscosity when the scientists add another 10 g/L of glucose, and buffered the pH to 4. The researchers also found that when ropy media was exposed to air, it immediately disappeared. However, exposing ropy beer to air is not an acceptable method for dealing with ropiness due to oxidation and acetic acid production in sour beer when it is exposed to oxygen <ref name="Oevelen_1979" />. The exact enzymatic activity for how ''Brettanomyces'' (or other microorganisms) break down EPS from ''Pediococcus'' is not well characterized, but it could be due to alpha-glucosidase activity in those yeasts (see [[Brettanomyces#Carbohydrate_Metabolism_and_Fermentation_Temperature|''Brettanomyces'' metabolism]] and [[Pediococcus#Carbohydrate_Metabolism|Carbohydrate Metabolism]] above).  This "ropiness" is actually caused by production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) in the form of β-glucan productionglucans (beta glucans) by some strains ''Pediococcus'' and some other lactic acid bacteria species. Ropiness also contains 4-15% proteins and nucleic acid in the form of RNA <ref name="Oevelen_1979" />. The β-glucans are made up of beta 1, 3 linkages and beta 1, a type 2 branches composed of exopolysaccharide single units <ref name="Wade_2018" />. A small amount (EPS20-30 mg/L <ref name="Wade_2018" />)of β-glucan is adequate enough to affect the visible viscosity of beer or wine. The gene known as Dps "dps" has been identified with the production of β-glucan/EPSin ''P. damnosus'', and the gene "gtf" in ''P. claussenii'' <ref name="Snauwaert"></ref>. Pediococci Not all strains of ''P. damnosus'' express the gene, and only ones that do will cause a beer to go ropy. Although it is not needed to survive in beer, EPS production is probably has importance in biofilm production <ref>[http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=23890699 Ethanol tolerance of lactic acid bacteria, including relevance of the exopolysaccharide gene gtf. Pittet V, Morrow K, Ziola B. 2011.]</ref>, and pediococci that are ropy have been found to be more acid, alcohol, and SO2 tolerant than other Pediococcipediococci. The thickness of the ropiness is increased with the presence of malic acid<ref name="ESP"></ref>. While strains of ''P. damnosus'' and ''P. parvulus'' are the ''Pediococcus'' species most associated with ropiness, some strains of ''P. pentosaceus'' have also been found to produce EPS <ref name="Wade_2018" />.  One study showed that the production of β-glucan coincided with the end of the growth phase of ''Pediococcus''. After While small amounts of β-glucan were produced during growth, after 2 days of growth, β-glucan production increased as growth slowed. β-glucan production stopped when growth stopped. This would explain why beer containing study showed that β-glucan production is linked to ''PedioPediococcous'' often goes ropy in shortly after naturally carbonating in growth, producing more towards the bottleend of growth. This study found that other variables were not factorsin the production of β-glucan, such as differing levels of alcohol (although alcohol levelsinteracts with the β-glucan in a way that makes the viscosity seem thicker). The study also found that the lack of agitation increased the β-glucan production(wine makers will often agitate or aerate ropy wine to cure the wine from ropiness). Higher A higher initial pH encourages higher growth(5.5+), which increases β-glucan production. A lower initial pH (3.5), so that also decreases growth and β-glucan production. A higher concentration of glucose increased growth and β-glucan production. Glocuse Glucose is needed for β-glucan production. While fructose alone is mostly insufficient to produce ropiness, a combination of glucose and fructose was slightly more efficient than glucose alone <ref name="ESP"></ref>. The introduction of malic acid, glucose, fructose, and/or nitrogen from things like fruit that is added to sour beer or even sugar added for natural carbonation can trigger ''Pediococcus'' growth and EPS production. Temperature and nitrogen levels also affect how much EPS is produced. One study found that at 12°C both growth and EPS production was much slower than at 25°C. After 29 days in agar media, the EPS in the 12°C samples tended to reach or slightly exceed the levels in the 25°C samples, which developed equivilant levels of EPS (or slightly less) within 7-13 days. Nitrogen levels also play a significant role, according to this study, particularly at lower fermentation temperatures. At 12°C, nitrogen was more important for the formation of EPS than glucose (although glucose was found to be the most important factor in EPS development overall, which is in agreement with the previously cited study). At 25°C nitrogen levels played a significant role in producing EPS, however less so than glucose levels. In general though, higher availability of nitrogen complimented higher levels of glucose to produce more EPS (and faster/higher cell growth) <ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160503000606 Exopolysaccharide production by Pediococcus damnosus 2.6 in a semidefined medium under different growth conditions. Maite Dueñas, Arantza Munduate, Aidé Perea, Ana Irastorza. 2003.]</ref>. Stress in the environment such as ethanol and SO₂ has also been shown to induce EPS production, and a lack of available glucose has been associated with eliminating the production of EPS (e.g. malolactic fermentation by ''Pediococcus'' in wine tends not to produce EPS, perhaps due to the lack of glucose in the environment) <ref name="Wade_2018" />. The presence of beta-glucans from barley have been observed to extend both the growth and the viability of ''Lactobacillus'' species in probiotics, indicating that ropiness might be a stress response <ref>[http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/15/2/3025/htm Barley β-Glucans-Containing Food Enhances Probiotic Performances of Beneficial Bacteria. Mattia P. Arena, Graziano Caggianiello, Daniela Fiocco, Pasquale Russo, Michele Torelli, Giuseppe Spano, and Vittorio Capozzi. 2014.]</ref><ref>[http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/13/5/6026/htm Beta-Glucans Improve Growth, Viability and Colonization of Probiotic Microorganisms. Pasquale Russo, Paloma López, Vittorio Capozzi, Pilar Fernández de Palencia, María Teresa Dueñas, Giuseppe Spano, and Daniela Fiocco. 2012.]</ref>. One study looked at this effect in beta-glucans produced by ''Pediococcus parvulus'' and found that ''L. plantarum'' had a longer viability in a fermented medium with no additional food source when that medium was first fermented with ''P. parvulus'' and EPS was produced. The ''L. plantarum'' strain that was tested did not ferment the beta-glucans. This suggests that there is an interspecies simbiotic relationship between lactic acid bacteria that produce EPS and those that don't, and when EPS is produced (beta-glucans are present) the bacteria survive longer. The study also observed that more EPS was produced in an oat based wort and a rice based wort, while fructose no EPS was produced in a barley based wort, suggesting that different food sources influence whether or not EPS is produced <ref>[http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/7/1588/htm In Situ β-Glucan Fortification of Cereal-Based Matrices by Pediococcus parvulus. Adrián Pérez-Ramos, María Luz Mohedano, Paloma López, Giuseppe Spano, Daniela Fiocco, Pasquale Russo, and Vittorio Capozzi. 2017.]</ref>. Pittet et al. (2011) found that the presence of the EPS genes in lactic acid bacteria did not correspond with the ability to survive beer-level ethanol levels or higher, which led to the hypothesis that perhaps EPS provides LAB a way to assist in the formation of [[Quality_Assurance#Biofilms|biofilm]], although this has yet to be demonstrated scientifically <ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0124-01 Ethanol Tolerance of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Including Relevance of the Exopolysaccharide Gene Gtf. Vanessa Pittet and Kendra Morrow and Barry Ziola. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0124-01.]</ref>. Along these same lines, [https://www.academia.edu/27927065/Lysozyme_resistance_of_the_ropy_strain_Pediococcus_parvulus_IOEB_8801_is_correlated_with_beta_glucan_accumulation_around_the_cell Coulon et al. (2012)] reported that an EPS producing strain of ''Pediococcus parvulus'' was more resistant to the antimicrobial enzyme [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysozyme lysozyme], which is insufficient often added to wine to kill lactic acid bacteria. The beta-glucan EPS formed a "coat" around the cells of the bacteria, thus protecting it from the lysozyme enzyme. When a beta-glucanase enzyme was added to break down the EPS produced by the bacteria, the beta-glucan "coat" disappeared from the cell walls and the lysozyme was once again effective at killing this strain of ''Pediococcus'' <ref>[https://www.academia.edu/27927065/Lysozyme_resistance_of_the_ropy_strain_Pediococcus_parvulus_IOEB_8801_is_correlated_with_beta_glucan_accumulation_around_the_cell Coulon, Joana et al. “Lysozyme Resistance of the Ropy Strain Pediococcus Parvulus IOEB 8801 Is Correlated with Beta-Glucan Accumulation around the Cell.” International Journal of Food Microbiology 159.1 (2012): 25–29. Web.]</ref>. It has been observed that ''Lactobacillus'' species can produce EPS (''Lactococcus lactis'', ''Lactobacillus delbrueckii'', ''Lactobacillus casei'', and ''Lactobacillus helveticus'') <ref name="ESP"></ref>.Some ''Oenococcus oeni'' strains can also produce EPS <ref>[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19659698/ Ciezack G, Hazo L, Chambat G, Heyraud A, Lonvaud-Funel A, Dols-Lafargue M. Evidence for exopolysaccharide production by Oenococcus oeni strains isolated from non-ropy wines. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Feb;108(2):499-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04449.x. Epub 2009 Jun 30. PMID: 19659698.</ref>. Some species of yeast can also produce EPS, including ''Candida'', ''Cryptococcus'', ''Debaryomyces'', ''Lipomyces'', ''Pichia'' <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2465980936763439/ Zach Taggart. Milk the Funk Facebook group post on EPS from yeast. 01/16/2019.]</ref>, ''Pseudozyma'', ''Rhodotorula'' and ''Sporobolomyces'' <ref name="Gientka_2015">[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283498621_Exopolysaccharides_from_yeast_insight_into_optimal_conditions_for_biosynthesis_chemical_composition_and_functional_properties_-_review?fbclid=IwAR1X6Y0rnquoF6SD-eH9m6EWpLIefgZJFUJK51NJYBooJWngxEVS2aR3PKE Exopolysaccharides from yeast: insight into optimal conditions for biosynthesis, chemical composition and functional properties - review. Iwona Gientka, Stanisław Błażejak, Stanisław Błażejak, Lidia Stasiak, Lidia Stasiak, Anna Chlebowska-Śmigiel, Anna Chlebowska-Śmigiel. 2015.]</ref>. ====Videos====* [https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/4547361381958707/ Highly viscous ropy beer video posted in MTF by Roi Funk Krispen.]* [https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/3478055812222608/ Post on MTF by Brandon Jones showing initial ropiness of a beer, and then after aging the ropiness out for 8 weeks.]* [https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1813022388725967/ Other videos on MTF of ropy beer.] ===Bacteriocins===Some strains of ''Pediococcus pentocaseus'' have been found to produce bacteriocins, which are toxins that are produced by the cells that inhibit the growth of other types of bacteria. For example, Bootleg Biology's "Sour Weapon" culture produces antimicrobials called bacteriocins or pediocins (see Bootleg Biology's [https://www.facebook.com/BootlegBiology/photos/a.148869931970401.1073741829.124634287727299/465185997005458/?type=1&theater Facebook post] regarding bacteriocins for more info). These can inhibit and kill similar species of bacteria like ''Lactobacillus'' and other ''Pediococcus'' species in mixed-culture fermentations. Bacteriocin production can be higher when ''Pediococcus pentocaseus'' is co-fermented with other bacteria than when it is fermented on its own <ref>[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02952/abstract Enhanced Bacteriocin Production by Pediococcus pentosaceus 147 in Co-Culture with Lactobacillus plantarum LE27 on Cheese Whey Broth. Carolina Gutiérrez-Cortés, Héctor Suarez, Gustavo Buitrago, Luis A. Nero and Svetoslav D. Todorov. 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02952.]</ref>. A strain of ''Pediococcus pentocaseus'' was found to produce a "class II" enteriocin that inhibits the growth of ''E. coli'' and ''Staphylococcus aureus'' <ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882401017314559 Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Tibetan yaks. Lei Wang, Hui Zhang, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Khalid Mehmood, Xiong Jiang, Mujahid Iqbal, Xiaole Tong, Xing Gao, Jiakui Li. 2017.]</ref>. ''P. damnosus'' also produces an antimicrobial compound called pediocin PD-1, which can inhibit several bacteria spp including ''O. oeni'' <ref>[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01486.x/full Growth optimization of Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832 and the influence of pH and nutrients on the production of pediocin PD-1. H.A. Nel1, R. Bauer, E.J. Vandamme and L.M.T. Dicks. Jan 2002.]</ref><ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15878403 Purification, partial amino acid sequence and mode of action of pediocin PD-1, a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832. Bauer R, Chikindas ML, Dicks LM. May 2005.]</ref>.  See also:* [[Lactobacillus#Bacteriocins|''Lactobacillus'' bacteriocins]].  ===Malolactic Fermentation===See the [[Cider#Microbes|Cider]] page. ===Biogenic Amines===Biogenic amines are produced by all living things and are present in many fermented beverages. High dosages can lead to health issues such as vomiting, headache, asthma, hypotension, and cardiac palpitation. Thus, biogenic amines have been studied intensely <ref name="Wade_2018" />. For more information on biogenic amines in beer in general, see [http://suigenerisbrewing.com/index.php/2019/01/22/biogenic-amines/ "Fact or Fiction – Biogenic Amines in Beer" by Dr. Bryan Heit]. Some strains of lactic acid bacteria, including ''Pediococcus'', can metabolize amino acids into biogenic amines, and potentially also degrade them <ref>[https://watermark.silverchair.com/0362-028x-60_7_831.pdf Tyramine Formation by Pediococcus spp. during Beer Fermentation. MARIA IZQUlERDO-PULIDO, JOSEP-MIQUEL CARCELLER-ROSA, ABEL MARINE-FONT, and M. CARMEN VIDAL-CAROU. 1996.]</ref><ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240429641_Effect_of_tyrosin_on_tyramin_formation_during_beer_fermentation Effect of tyrosin on tyramin formation during beer fermentation. Maria Izquierdo-Pulido, M. Carmen Vidal-Carou. 2000.]</ref>. The number of strains capable of producing biogenic amines appears to be very low. [https://link.springer.com/pdf%2F10.1007%2FBF01105812 Weiller and Radler (1976)] found that only one out 28 strains of ''P. cerevisiae'' (later reclassified to ''P. damnosus'' and ''P. pentosaceus'') produced biogenic amines. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/973463 Strickland et al. (2016)] found that out of multiple species of ''Pediococcus'', only one strain of ''P. inopinatus'' produced biogenic amines, and it only produced 3.3 mg/L of histamine. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160511002893 García‐Ruiz et al. (2011)] reported that 9 out of 85 strains of ''P. parvulus'' and ''P. pentosaceus'' were able to degrade some biogenic amines (histamine, tyrosine, and putrescine) in culture media, but were unable to do so in wine, indicating that any degradation of biogenic amines in wine that might occur is not likely due to lactic acid bacteria, but due to some other cause <ref name="Wade_2018" />.  Izquierdo-Pulido et al. (1995) found that out of 35 samples of Spanish lagers contaminated with ''Pediococcus'', 21 of them had final tyramine levels between 5-10 mg/l, 6 of them had no detected tyramine, and 8 of them had high levels around 25 mg/l, with higher levels being correlated to higher cell counts of ''Pediococcus''. higher levels of tyramine were associated with higher cell counts of the tyramine-producing strains during smaller bench test fermentations as well. There was no correlation between the presence of wild yeast and tyramine production. Filtration and pasteurization after fermentation had no effect on the levels of tyramine in the final beers <ref>[https://watermark.silverchair.com/0362-028x-59_2_175.pdf Biogenic Amine Changes Related to Lactic Acid Bacteria During Brewing. MARIAI ZQUIERDO-PULIDO, JUDIT FONT-FABREGAS, JOSEP-MIQUEL CARCELLER-ROSA, ABEL MARINE-FONT, and CARMENVIDAL-CAROU. 1995.]</ref>. De Roos et al (2024) found the ''P. damnosus'' in two samples of lambic had the genetic capability to produce histamine. The total biogenic amine content of the lambic was at levels below that which has been deemed safe by European regulatory bodies <ref name="Roosa_2024"/>.  See also:* [[Spontaneous_Fermentation#Biogenic_Amines|Biogenic amines in spontaneously fermented beer.]]* [[Brettanomyces#Biogenic_Amines|Biogenic amine production by ''Brettanomyces''.]]* [[Wine#Biogenic_Amines|Biogenic amines in wine.]]* [http://www.horscategoriebrewing.com/2019/01/spontaneous-fermentation-and-biogenic.html "Spontaneous fermentation and biogenic amines" by Dr. Dave Janssen; review of several studies that looked at the levels of biogenic amines in different beers and their production, and their potential flavor contribution.]* [http://suigenerisbrewing.com/index.php/2019/01/22/biogenic-amines/ "Fact or Fiction – Biogenic Amines in Beer" by Dr. Bryan Heit; an analysis of biogenic amines in spontaneously fermented beer and associated health concerns.]** [https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2570617069633158/?comment_id=2570641549630710&reply_comment_id=2570664762961722&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R8%22%7D Follow up from Dr. Heit on MTF on "allergic-like" reactions to biogenic amines.]

''P. claussenii'' tends to produce a smaller amount of acetic acid than lactic acid in about a 1:3 ratio. ''P. damnosus'' can tends to produce only lactic acid and no acetic acid <ref name="Geissler">[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160515301033 Metabolic strategies of beer spoilage lactic acid bacteria in beer. Andreas J. Geissler, Jürgen Behr, Kristina von Kamp, Rudi F. Vogel. 2015.]</ref>, although some strains have been found to produce high small amounts of diacetyl during lactic acetic acid production of around 100-300 ppm. This level is slightly below and above flavor thresholds in lager beer (but could be additive with other organisms) <ref>[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10461002/j.13652050-26720416.20002010.00956tb00393.x/pdf abstract Isolation, Identification , and Characterisation of pediococci by ribotypingBeer-Spoilage Lactic Acid Bacteria from Microbrewed Beer from Victoria, Australia. RGarry Menz, Christian Andrighetto, Angiolella Lombardi, Viviana Corich, Peter Aldred, Frank Vriesekoop. 2010. Satokari]</ref>, Tbut significantly less than the total acetic acid often found in gueuze (around 700-2200 ppm <ref>[http://www. Mattilahorscategoriebrewing.com/2016/07/duivelsbier-Sandholm and Mof-halle.Lhtml Jansen, Dave. Suihko Hors Category Blog. Journal "Duivelsbier of Applied Microbiology 2000, 88, 260–265Halle". 07/30/2016. Retrieved 01/31/2018.]</ref>) and Flanders reds (300-2300 ppm <ref>[http://mmbrwww.asmsciencedirect.orgcom/contentscience/77article/2pii/157.full The Microbiology S0168160515301896 Microbial diversity and metabolite composition of Malting and BrewingBelgian red-brown acidic ales. Nicholas AIsabel Snauwaert, Sanne P. BokulichaRoels, and Charles W. BamforthFilip Van Nieuwerburg, Anita Van Landschoot, Luc De Vuyst, Peter Vandamme. June 20132015.]</ref>). ''P. damnosusPediococcus'' also produces an antimicrobial compound called pediocin PDcarries the decarboxylase enzyme (PAD) which converts hydroxycinnamic acid (ferulic acid) into phenols (4-1, which can inhibit several bacterias including ''O. oeni'' vinyl guaiacol) <refname="lentz_2018">[http://onlinelibrarywww.wileymdpi.com/2311-5637/4/1/20/html#B13-fermentation-04-00020 The Impact of Simple Phenolic Compounds on Beer Aroma and Flavor. Michael Lentz. 2018. doi: 10.3390/10fermentation4010020.1046]</jref>.1365-2672 While ''Pediococcus'' has been linked to the creation of acrolein via the metabolism of glycerol, evidence supports that this is very rare in ''Pediococcus'' species.2001 In wine, acrolein reacts with anthocyanins and other phenols to produce an intense bitterness.01486 Acrolein production in wine has been linked to some strains of ''Lactobacillus''.x/full Growth optimization Some strains of ''Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832 '' have been found to metabolize gylcerol in beer and wine under aerobic and semi-aerobic environments, but the influence metabolism of pH and nutrients on glycerol in the presence of oxygen results in the production of pediocin PDlactic acid, acetic acid, diacetyl, and 2,3-1. H.A. Nel1butanediol, Rand not acrolein <ref name="Wade_2018" />. Bauer ==Storage==For instructions on how to make slants at home capable of storing any microbe for potentially 2+ years, E[http://suigenerisbrewing.Jblogspot. Vandamme com/2015/11/easy-home-yeast-banking-and L-video.Mhtml see Bryan's video on Sui Generis Brewing (requires a pressure cooker)].T. Dicks. Jan 2002.]</ref> Justin Amaral recommends using isotonic sodium chloride and freezing media that is meant for 32°F freezers (lasts around 2 years) <ref>[httphttps://www.ncbifacebook.nlm.nih.govcom/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/pubmed1859788084049397/15878403 Purification, partial amino acid sequence and mode of action of pediocin PD-1, a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832?comment_id=1859790364049169&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D Justin Amaral. Bauer R, Chikindas ML, Dicks LMMilk The Funk Facebook comment on storing ''Pediococcus''. May 200510/23/2017.]</ref>.