13,703
edits
Changes
Coolship
,no edit summary
(This section in progress.)
Some homebrewers prefer to purchase or repurpose from the home suitable shallow, food grade containers used in cooking or catering. These include stainless steel or aluminum baking pans, large glass baking pans, food grade plastic trays and storage containers. These vessels are often cheap and may already be available in the home. It can be tough working with large vessels with no valve to drain the coolship into a fermentor. One must make sure the selected vessel is designed for use with hot liquids so it does not crack or melt. Others design coolships using specialized equipment fabricated for that purpose or created out of stainless steel or copper parts. An easy route to design a coolship may employ restaurant supplies such as steel storage racks and stainless steel tubs. These designs allow for convenient features such as a ball valve for draining the cooled wort or screening to keep out break material from the boil kettle. The coolship can be built to an optimum surface area to volume ratio. These coolships are often the most expensive route but the most customized and durable. A third option is to use the boil kettle as a coolship. In this method the kettle is simply left outside after the boil. Here there is no need to purchase or design a separate vessel and it may already provide a valve to drain the cooled wort and handles for easy movement. However, by using the boil kettle the brewer has no choice in the surface to volume ratio of the cooling wort and there is no opportunity to remove the break material from the wort prior to cooling. Regardless of the method selected, the surface to volume ratio should be carefully considered due to its affects on cooling and microorganism populations in the spontaneous fermentation. ===Surface Area to Volume Ratio Example===James HowatThe cooling rate of the exposed wort is influenced by a number of factors including the ambient temperature, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity thermal conductivity] of the coolship material, and the surface area to volume ratio <ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/aqa/heatingandcooling/heatingrev6.shtml ''Energy transfer by heating''s example of how . BBC website, Bitesize section. Retrieved 7/24/2015.]</ref>. The most important factor is the ambient temperature, but the easiest variable to find control is the surface area to volume ratio . The greater the surface area of a coolship is found belowgiven liquid the faster it will cool <ref>[http://www.fmf.uni-lj.si/~planinsic/articles/Cheese%20cubes_EJP.pdf The surface-to-volume ratio in thermal physics: from cheese cube physics to animal metabolism. Gorazd Planinsic and Michael Vollmer. European Journal of Physics. Note that this 29 (2008) 369–384.]</ref>. For example , imagine 100 liters of hot liquid is not in a very wide and flat container. It will cool much faster than if it was in a perfectly square container, and even faster still than if it was in a true spherical container. See [http://wordpress.mrreid.org/2011/10/20/spherical-ice-cubes-and-surface -area -to -volume -ratio equation, but a simplified version / this article for another explanation of how surface area to volume ratio affects cooling]. Some brewers claim that only measures controlling the top surface speed of cooling is important to assembling a desired blend of microorganisms in the coolshipwort <ref name="Howat">[http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/how-to-brew/resources/conference-seminars/ ''Wild and Spontaneous Fermentation at Home''. It makes sense to only consider Presentation by James Howat at 2015 NHC.]</ref>. Microbes survive and multiply at different temperatures and cooling too long or too fast may produce a beer that lacks desirable character or possesses an excess of undesirable character. A larger surface area of wort will allow for greater inoculation of microbes although if the wort cools too quickly the majority of inoculation will occur at cooler temperatures and affect the top surface ratio and growth of various microbes in the coolship since most wort. (For more information on the effects of the heat cooling rate see [Spontaneous Fermentation].) Scaling a commercial-sized coolship down to homebrewing volumes will escape from produce a coolship that does not match the uncovered top surface area to volume ratio of the larger coolship. A true For this reason, the surface area to volume ratio would show an even larger difference should be the driving factor in determining how to design the shape and depth of a homebrewing coolship. In his 2015 National Homebrewer's Conference presentation, Wild and Spontaneous Fermentation at Home, James Howat provides a comparison of the surface area to volume ratios between a 36 BBL coolship and a 10 gallon coolship scaled down linearly from the two example coolships below 36 BBL coolship <ref name="Howat"></ref>. AdditionallyTo keep the comparison simple, this example shows that it compares only on the surface area of wort exposed to volume ratio the air because this is not linear across vessel sizeswhere the most heat escapes from the wort. (A comparison including the total surface area of wort would show an even larger difference between the examples.)
<code>
:Example of a 36 bbl coolship:
::Dimensions of the example 36 coolship: 10 ft ' x 10 ft ' x 1.5 ft'.
::Wort volume = 1122 gallons = 150 cubic feet.
::Surface area of the top surface of the wort = 100 square feetsq. ft.::Surface Area to Volume ratio = 100/150 = '''0.67''' square feet sq. ft. per cubic foot.
:Example of a 10 gallon coolship:
::Dimensions of the example miniature 10 gallon coolship: 2.5 ft ' x 2.5 ft ' x 0.20 ft (2.4 inches).'
::Wort volume: 9.35 gallons = 1.25 cubic feet.
::Surface area of the top surface of the wort = 6.25 square feetsq. ft.::Surface Area to Volume ratio = 6.25/1.25 = '''5''' square feet sq. ft. per cubic foot.
</code>
==See Also==