Changes

Closely related to ''Saccharomyces'', ''Brettanomyces'' diverged from its cousin yeast more than 200 million years ago. Both genera evolved independently to ferment sugar and produce ethanol <ref name="Schifferdecker">[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/yea.3023/pdf The wine and beer yeast Dekkera bruxellensis. Anna Judith Schifferdecker, Sofia Dashko, Olena P. Ishchuk, and Jure Piškur. 7 July 2014.]</ref><ref name="Gounot_2019">[https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/826990v1.full High complexity and degree of genetic variation in Brettanomyces bruxellensis population. Jean-Sébastien Gounot, Cécile Neuvéglise, Kelle C. Freel, Hugo Devillers, Jure Piškur, Anne Friedrich, Joseph Schacherer. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/826990 .]</ref>. Although first isolated in 1889 and again in 1899 by scientists at Guinness, the discovery of ''Brettanomyces'' was first publicly published by the Director of laboratory of the New Carlsberg Brewery, Hjelte Claussen, in 1904 after he cultured it in 1903 from English beers that exhibited a sluggish secondary fermentation <ref>[http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/2013/06/when-was-brettanomyces-discovererd.html "When was Brettanomyces discovered?" Ron Pattenson. Shut Up About Barclay Perkins blog. 06/29/2013. retrieved 08/18/2016.]</ref><ref>[http://breweryhistory.com/journal/archive/149/Yeast.pdf Ray Anderson. "ONE YEAST OR TWO? PURE YEAST AND TOP FERMENTATION". The Brewery History Society. 2012.]</ref>. At the time of discovery, Claussen was aiming to recreate the flavor profile of traditional English ales by fermenting them with pure cultures of ''Saccharomyces'', and either pitching pure cultures of his newly discovered ''Brettanomyces'' yeast along with ''Saccharomyces'', or as he preferred, after the primary fermentation of ''Saccharomyces'' <ref>[https://www.facebook.com/download/448702618652516/GB190328184A.pdf "Improvements in and connected with the Manufacture of English Beers or Malt Liquors and in the Production of Pure Yeast Cultures for use therein." Patent application by Hjelte Claussen for ''Brettanomyces''. A.D. 1903.]</ref>. ''Brettanomyces'', along with [[Hops#The_Freshening_Power_of_the_Hop_.28Hop_Creep.29|dry hop creep]], was identified as the source of secondary fermentation during long aged ales, contributing to their lasting high carbonation <ref>[https://archive.org/details/principlespracti00syke "The principles and practice of brewing" Sykes, Walter John. London, C. Griffin and Company, limited, 1907. Pgs 384-388.]</ref><ref>[https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/4709953772366133 Gareth Young. Milk The Funk Facebook group thread about English brewers historically relying on Brettanomyces and dry hop creep for carbonation in long aged ales. 06/17/2021.]</ref>. ''Brettanomyces'' was typically included in 1800's English Stock Ales and Pale Ales <ref>[https://www.crowdcast.io/e/IPA-Past-Present-Future/1 Ron Pattinson. "History of IPA -1700s to 2021". Doug Piper's interview with Ron Pattinson. 07/25/2021.]</ref>(~56 and 59 mins in). Although Claussen saw the character from ''Brettanomyces'' as a desirable character in ales and identified its character as a quality of traditional English ales, as pure cultures of ''Saccharomyces'' were introduced in English brewing in the early 20th century, ''Brettanomyces'' became identified as a contaminate in both wineries and breweries due to some of the phenols, acids, and haze that it sometimes produces. These phenols and acids have generally been described as "barnyard", "burnt plastic", "wet animal", "fecal", and "horse sweat", although some tasters describe these flavors with different terminology because they perceive certain flavor compounds differently while some other tasters simply cannot detect certain flavor compounds at all <ref name="smith_divol_2016" /><ref name="Schifferdecker" /><ref name="Lucy_2015">[http://www.ajevonline.org/content/66/3/379 Brettanomyces bruxellensis Aroma-Active Compounds Determined by SPME GC-MS Olfactory Analysis. C.M. Lucy Joseph, Elizabeth A. Albino, Susan E. Ebeler, Linda F. Bisson. 2015.]</ref>. The general viewpoint of brewers (other than Lambic and Flanders red/brown brewers in Belgium) and vintners that ''Brettanomyces'' is primarily a spoilage organism held for many decades, and still holds in most cases. More recently the positive flavor components that have been identified in ''Brettanomyces'' beer such as pineapple, stone fruits, and to some degree acetic acid, have regained popularity with brewers outside of Belgium. Some winemakers and wine tasters have also described wines with certain flavor compounds derived from ''Brettanomyces'' as positive characteristics of some wines <ref>[https://daily.sevenfifty.com/the-everything-guide-to-brettanomyces/ "The Everything Guide to Brettanomyces." GuildSomm. April 15, 2018. Retrieved 03/04/2021.]</ref>. It is important to keep in mind that individual tasters on tasting panels describe some flavor compounds as "negative" while others describe them as "positive" (and sometimes a mixed response is given by a taster in regards to a certain flavor compound), and this discrepancy in interpretations of ''Brettanomyces'' derived flavor compounds appears to be based on personal preference and experience. In some cases, for example for vinyl phenols, low levels that are not detectable by some people, but detected by others contribute positively to wine, while higher amounts contribute negatively. Thus, a lower intensity of some flavor compounds can be seen as more desirable. Overall, the enjoyment or displeasure of the various flavor compounds produced by ''Brettanomyces'' and at certain levels is completely subjective <ref name="Lucy_2015" /><ref>[https://www.guildsomm.com/public_content/features/articles/b/kelli-white/posts/brettanomyces Brettanomyces: Science & Context. Kelli White. GuildSomm website. 03/29/2018. Retrieved 05/10/2019.]</ref>.